Conversationgate
Wednesday, March 21, 2007 at 10:24AM
Figaro
hilary_youtube.jpg
Quote:  “One month ago, I began a conversation with you… I hope you’ve learned a little bit more about what I’m believing and trying to do, and really help this conversation about our country get started.  I hope to keep this conversation going.”  Hilary Clinton as Big Sister in a YouTube attack video.

Figure of Speech: antistrephon (an-TIS-tre-phon), the boomerang figure.  From the Greek, meaning “turning to the opposite side.”

A mysteriously produced video takeoff on Apple’s famous “1984” ad shows a zombified audience staring at a giant screen while a scary-looking Senator Clinton speaks.  The video ends with an athletic woman shattering the screen with a sledgehammer. Why did the video’s makers choose to have Hilary talk about a “conversation”?  Because they want to turn a favorable label against her.  Watch the ad, and “conversation” sounds like a dictator’s doublespeak.

The video constitutes a masterful antistrephon, a figure of redefinition that turns your opponent’s term against him. The technology makes this seem like a new political tactic.  But in the early 1800s, politicos used the same rhetorical device:  they printed anonymous pamphlets that boomeranged their rivals’ terms.  

YouTube’s political videos, in other words, are nothing more than computerized pamphleteering.

Snappy Answer:  “When do I get to talk?”

Article originally appeared on Figures of Speech (http://inpraiseofargument.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.