About This Site

Figaro rips the innards out of things people say and reveals the rhetorical tricks and pratfalls. For terms and definitions, click here.
(What are figures of speech?)
Ask Figaro a question!

This form does not yet contain any fields.

    « Fry Up Some Words | Main | George Philip’s Awesome Impactfulness »
    Thursday
    Oct212010

    How Well Do You Know the Constitution?

    Given all the rhetoric about the secret government plot to undermine the Constitution, we wondered how many people had actually read the document.  So we put together a quiz.  After you take it, come on back and comment. 

    Take the Quiz.

    Already taken it? How’d you do? If you got a perfect score, then you can join the Founders’ celestial kaffeeklatch when you die.  If you scored above 80, then you’re an Ideal Citizen—someone who actually read the darn thing instead of just mouthing off about it.  If you barely passed with a score of 70, congratulate yourself; most people fail it. I haven’t met a lawyer yet who passed.

    And what if you flunked? Then you qualify to join the distinguished faculty of Glenn Beck’s Beck University.

    Add more of your own questions in the comments here, and, like the Constitution itself, we’ll make amendments.

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    Reader Comments (30)

    Marco, I'm not sure what exactly your question is. The Libertarians and Birchers stand united in being opposed to "the more socialistic models," you say. This is excellent rhetoric, because it implies that socialism is a current practical choice in this country. Yet there's exactly one self-described socialist in the U.S. Senate (the class-by-himself Bernie Sanders), none in the U.S. Senate; and our governorships remain socialist-free.

    Some of Obama's actions in the financial crisis have been labeled as socialistic--and, indeed, taking over auto companies counts--but the feds have been scrambling to re-privatize those companies. Was the healthcare legislation socialistic? Not hardly; the government takes a slightly larger role, while private employers remain responsible for their employees' insurance. The "single payer" plan, which would have expanded Medicare, suffered an early abortion.

    So the Birchers and Partiers seem to be fighting a really cool-sounding menace which looks nothing like the socialism that's rapidly disappearing in Europe.

    Libertarianism, like most political philosophies, gains little traction in the public mind unless there's an enemy to fight. Where's the enemy? Taxation? Our taxes have been going down, not up--one major reason for the exploding deficit. Big government? Again, if you count employees and regulation (not budgets!), its size has remained steady. Budgets are indeed huge, but an enemy has to be personal, not the stuff of spreadsheets and out-of-control deficits. So the Libertarians swiped their enemy from the Birchers.

    If only that enemy existed.
    October 26, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterFigaro
    I think I’m beginning to understand where you’re coming from. I agree, Figaro: The Libertarians are latching on to the neo-Birchers, exploiting them to gain momentum against a similar enemy. (I guess I hoped this would be implicit in my posts).

    Also, it's just as true that in America--by which I mean the US--we have few-to-none options when it comes to choosing between the free market and socialism. I was just trying to paint how black and white the world is to them. How they frame the debate. I've been arguing for a nuanced approach to this debate with on associate of mine, whose stated duty is to take up arms against the Muslim/commie forces at work in our country. It's been my experience that getting a tea party activist to look a situation with shades of nuance is like giving a fish bicycle-riding lessons.
    October 26, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMarco
    I'm sorry. That last sentence was probably a bit too much; however, it felt good to write.
    October 26, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMarco
    More like a kettle of fish, Marco. And I liked that last sentence.

    Fig.
    October 26, 2010 | Registered CommenterFigaro
    A fish riding a bike - I love it. It gets your point across in a humourous way that (hopefully) takes the sting out of the implication that tea-partiers-are-inflexible-dimwits. I'm sure such a descriptive punch line is a rhetorical figure. Fig - Care to educate us - what's the figure?
    October 26, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterContent
    @Content

    Pulling out my copy of TYFA: I believe, the fish riding a bike, a variation on "a woman needs a man, like a fish needs a bicycle" is the surprise ending (paraprosdokian)
    October 27, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterJohn Hritz
    Perhaps it is more like diasyrmus...
    October 27, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterJohn Hritz
    It's actually a good ol' analogy, John.
    October 27, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterFigaro
    @Figaro Sometimes a duck is just a duck...
    October 27, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterJohn Hritz
    Unless it's a duck riding a bike.
    October 27, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterFigaro

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.