About This Site

Figaro rips the innards out of things people say and reveals the rhetorical tricks and pratfalls. For terms and definitions, click here.
(What are figures of speech?)
Ask Figaro a question!

Search
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    « Of All the Figures in All the Gin Joints … | Main | Uncle Sparky's Cabin »
    Tuesday
    23Aug2005

    Negative Sunnis Are Not Very Positive

    Iraq_flag_large.pngQuote:   “If the Sunnis do not support the constitution, that would be very negative.”  American Ambassador to Iraq Zalmay Khalilzad

    Figure of Speech:   tautology (taw TAH low gee), the redundant figure

    “Negative” means “bad” in diplomatese.  If the Sunnis say no to the draft Iraq constitution, that would certainly be negative.  But since “no” and “negative” mean the same thing, the ambassador commits a tautology—repeating the same thought in different words. 

    “Free gift.”  “New innovation.”  “Violent battle.”  All around, we’re surrounded by tautologies.  (Sorry.)  Yogi Berra turned the figure into an unconscious art form:  “You can learn a lot just by observing.”  Most of the time, though, the tautology is a pair of twins (whoops!) who are too close for comfort.

    The writing on the Iraqi flag, by the way, means “God is great.”  Which, arguably, qualifies as a tautology.

    Snappy Answer:   “And if we don’t pull out of Iraq, we’ll still be there.”

    Got a snappier answer?  Email Figaro.

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    Reader Comments (6)

    would 'uncommonly rare' qualify as a tautology?
    February 26, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterSimon Giles
    That depends on whom you ask, but since you asked Figaro, the answer is no. It's a mere redundancy. A true tautology has logic chasing its own tail: it uses the conclusion to prove the conclusion.

    Fig.
    February 26, 2007 | Registered CommenterFigaro
    actually twins come in more than pears... now what kind of rhetorical device did I just use? or did I even just use one?
    April 15, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterniceoboe
    well now that I think about it that would be a pointless/nonsensical pun...
    April 15, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterniceoboe
    "Safe haven" is a tautological phrase that I'm aware of, and detest, but what about "potentially dangerous"? If something has the potential to harm then it's dangerous. So what does "potentially dangerous" mean?
    September 20, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDavid
    Currently now.....................first initial reaction..........................unthaw the food...............advanced warning................true fact..........................very first...................and finally, "plus, as an extra added bonus, a free gift at no charge to you!".
    September 24, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterJay

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.