And Hold the Ancho... I Mean, The Fish Whose Stench Offends Allah
Quote: “President Ahmadinejad has issued a decree banning the use of foreign words and urging us to find substitutes for those words.” Spokesman for Iran’s Academy of Persian Language and Literature.
Figure of Speech: Atticism (ATT-i-cism), the native language ploy.
From now on, you must call an Iranian pizza an “elastic loaf.” A helicopter is not a helicopter but “rotating wings.” And a mobile phone now has the sexy name of “companion phone,” allowing randy young Iranians to set their companion phones to vibrate.
Why would a democratically elected religious fanatic care about foreign words? Because speaking pure Persian makes modern Persians feel more Persian, raising them over pizza-spewing foreigners and boosting loyalty to their plain-spoken leader. Atticism, the use of “pure” language, dates back to ancient Greece, when Athenians insisted on speaking good old Attic Greek (free of Persian words, coincidentally).
Fundamentalists and “official language” boosters are often the same people, because values and thenative tongue serve the same purpose: to make the tribe feel purer than thou. Thank God they don’t live in America.
Snappy Answer: “But Persian is foreign.”
Reader Comments (10)
But don't stop sending your daily figaros - I love them. There's much to love about you lot - just don't take yourselves so seriously. Or that guy either! The French have done what he's done with babies names - apparently you can't name your baby anything that doesn't appear on their official register. It's just people striving to retain their own identity. Whatever it may be.
Nonetheless, he is no hegemonist either. An aborigine had good reason to resent all those arrogant white people when they showed up Down Under. (What's "There goes the neighborhood" in aboriginese?) And you have a right to resent Americans when we get all Wal-Mart on you.
But when Figaro wrote, "Thank God they don't live in America," he was being ironical. Christinianist Americans want to declare English as the official language. Besides being a cynical rhetorical ploy, the movement betrays a lack of confidence. Since when did we Americans start PRESERVING cultures?
As we say in America, "I mean, jeez."
Even if it means the Real Academia EspaƱola in Spain now accept "bacon" as an official Spanish word... (we don't use it in Mexico, by the way - we still say "chorizo" - but it seems English influence is strong in Spain, too).
We Americans got our bacon from the Brits, who got it from the French, who, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, got it from those piggy Teutons, for whom the word meant "backside."
Which brings us around to saving our bacon. Thanks, Fia.
What does one call it when a group purposefully manipulates the language into in-group and out-group forms? Atticism implies the language is returning to a real or imagined past form. And it's not quite the development of slang or jargon, which is spontaneous.
An example might help. According to Stephen Pinker, the reason that we should not split infinitives dates back to the 1800s. During that time, elites wanted to distinguish their English. The best way to come off as high class was to speak with style. Style manuals began to flourish. In the spirit of capitalism, they began to compete. The manuals became longer and more arcane to make the user feel more erudite. (Arcane = erudite? The birth of pomo?) Hence, English-speaking elites chose to adopt new rules in order to sound more sophisticated than the plebs around them.
What is that process called?