About This Site

Figaro rips the innards out of things people say and reveals the rhetorical tricks and pratfalls. For terms and definitions, click here.
(What are figures of speech?)
Ask Figaro a question!

This form does not yet contain any fields.

    « Why Mommy Can't Win Elections | Main | Onward, Christian Soldier! »
    Tuesday
    Sep192006

    Academia Goes to DefCon 3

    yale_missile.jpgQuote:  “I talk to lots of presidents who would love to disarm, but they’re afraid to do it unilaterally.”  Colin Diver, president of Reed College, in the New York Times.

    Figure of Speech:  auxesis (aux-EE-sis), the exaggerated label.  From the Greek, meaning “increase.”

    Run for cover! America’s elite colleges are in an “arms race,” according to President Diver.  And what are their weapons? Nukes? Gas? Double secret probation?

    No, the weapon of academic destruction is merit aid — money given to top students regardless of need.  It’s an arms race only in the sense that no college wants to stand down first, for fear of lowering their standing in U.S. News & World Report.  Diver is guilty of an auxesis, a form of hyperbole that applies a mountainous label to a molehill of an issue or thing.

    While Monty Python used it to great effect, the auxesis is one of the most insidious figures.  Left-wingers and Donald Rumsfeld refer to their political enemies as “fascists.”  Politicians call criminal suspects “predators.”  When this exaggerated labeling becomes prevalent, freedom-loving citizens get turned into traitors and suspects get stripped of their human rights (because they’re not human, that’s why!).

    Snappy Answer:  President Diver, step away from that figure!

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    Reader Comments (1)

    "When this exaggerated labeling becomes prevalent, freedom-loving citizens get turned into traitors and suspects get stripped of their human rights (because they’re not human, that’s why!)."

    I wish more people were stating observations such as yours quoted here. It is deeply disappointing that human evolution appears to include inaccurate and indolent use of our language, leading to mistrust and indifference rather than compassion.
    September 26, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterAnne

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.