About This Site

Figaro rips the innards out of things people say and reveals the rhetorical tricks and pratfalls. For terms and definitions, click here.
(What are figures of speech?)
Ask Figaro a question!

This form does not yet contain any fields.

    « The Rhetorical Antidote to Football | Main | They'll Only Listen If It's Evil »

    Does This Make My Bottom Line Look Fat?

    halloween_party_dog_with_fake_butt.jpgQuote:  “In labor relations the bottom line isn’t always the bottom line.”  James Surowiecki in the New Yorker.

    Figure of Speech:  antistasis (an-TIS-ta-sis), the repeat that changes meaning. From the Greek, meaning “opposing position.” Also antistrophe (an-TIS-tro-phee), the last-word repeater.  From the Greek, meaning “turning around.” (Also called epistrophe.)

    Yes, we just plugged the antistasis. But don’t you see, Figaro loves the antistasis! It’s such a witty little figure.

    The wielder in this case, New Yorker staff writer James Surowiecki, uses it to describe the dilemma that striking television and movie writers face. Yeah, they already make plenty of dough ($200,000 a year, according to the industry). But the scribes say they aren’t striking out of greed. They’re striking for justice: they want their fair share from shows played on the Internet.

    Rhetoric that cries for justice can work when you want to change society, but it can bollix a practical negotiation. Why? Because the justice argument uses demonstrative rhetoric, while a negotiation requires political, deliberative rhetoric. Which raises the question: What in blazes is Figaro talking about? For answers, see the excerpts from Figaro’s book on values and the three basic issues.

    Snappy Answer: At bottom, that’s a great line.

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    References (1)

    References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
    • Response
      Response: Ncaa Sportsbook
      Ncaa Sportsbook

    Reader Comments (2)

    Fig - retire that graphic, please !

    It is much too disturbing. Plus, it just doesn't seem to serve the topic.

    How about a "back to the drawing board" on this one.
    December 4, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterHoward
    It isn't mine, I swear. The dog wore it to a Halloween party. Is it more disturbing to humiliate a dog than, say, a presidential candidate? Perhaps it is.

    December 4, 2007 | Registered CommenterFigaro

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.