About This Site

Figaro rips the innards out of things people say and reveals the rhetorical tricks and pratfalls. For terms and definitions, click here.
(What are figures of speech?)
Ask Figaro a question!

  • Contact Me

    This form will allow you to send a secure email to the owner of this page. Your email address is not logged by this system, but will be attached to the message that is forwarded from this page.
  • Your Name *
  • Your Email *
  • Subject *
  • Message *

« Anvil Now Falls on Head | Main | He Was the Best of Preachers, He Was the Worst of Preachers »
Tuesday
Apr012008

Johnny, McCain, Please Report to the Principal

mccain-principal.jpgQuote:  “I will always believe that there is a Mr. Ravenel somewhere for every child who needs him.” John McCain, speaking to his alma mater, the Episcopal School in Alexandria, Virginia

Figure of Speech: antonomasia (an-to-no-MAY-sia), the namer. From the Greek, meaning “other name.”

While Obama’s minister continues to haunt him, and Clinton channels Rocky, Senator McCain does an early victory lap around his angry boyhood.  In a speech to his old high school, McCain recalls his English teacher, a WWII war vet and football coach.

Offer merit increases, McCain implies, and Mr. Ravenels will be springing up all over the place — a fine antonomasia that makes his personal story universal and politically relevant. The antonomasia uses a person’s name to describe a set of traits, and it serves as a rhetorical incubator for eponyms.

“He helped teach me to be a man,” McCain says. You rarely hear that phrase from a Democrat — either because it’s sexist or because no Democratic male was ever initiated into the manly mysteries.

Figaro is an independent, but he counts himself among the machismoally agnostic. Then again, you’ll never find him running for president. Even as a woman.

Snappy Answer: “Please don’t propose a No Mr. Ravenel Left Behind Act.”

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

What if Hillary had paid tribute to a High School instructor who had "helped teach her to be a woman"?

It shows you that indeed our language still exhibits a bias, so to speak, as "manhood" generally equates with maturity or inner strength while "womanhood" generally equates with sexual maturity or maternal traits (again - in the sense of cultural verbal associations, not as a reflection of mental of biological reality).

April 3, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterHoward
Yes, the connotation of "teaching me to be a woman" would be far different. And a lot more fun.

Fig.
April 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterFigaro

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.