About This Site

Figaro rips the innards out of things people say and reveals the rhetorical tricks and pratfalls. For terms and definitions, click here.
(What are figures of speech?)
Ask Figaro a question!

  • Contact Me

    This form will allow you to send a secure email to the owner of this page. Your email address is not logged by this system, but will be attached to the message that is forwarded from this page.
  • Your Name *
  • Your Email *
  • Subject *
  • Message *

« We Mean, Ick | Main | Hope Is an Old Muscle »
Wednesday
Apr232008

She Can't Be Stopped

50_HILLARY.jpgQuote:  “If he does not have the gumption to put me in my place, when superdelegates are deserting me, money is drying up, he’s outspending me 2-to-1 on TV ads, my husband’s going crackers and party leaders are sick of me, how can he be trusted to totally obliterate Iran and stop Osama?” Maureen Dowd in the New York Times

Figure of Speech: dialogismus (dial-o-GIS-mus), the quoting figure.

It’s overtime again. Obama just can’t “close the deal,” as Clinton triumphantly puts it. Maureen Dowd, the feline columnist for the Times, sums up Hillary’s argument in a hyperbolic dialogismus, a figure that puts words in another person’s mouth — often in a way that the “quotee” wouldn’t exactly put herself.

Good point about the husband and the party leaders, though, Hill.

Snappy Answer:  Do we have to totally obliterate Iran? Can’t we just, like, obliterate it?

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

Interesting use, too, of the very pre-feminist idea of putting a woman in her place: sex (or gender) and race don't seem to be far from the surface this year.

And that is a hilarious collage, by the way.
April 24, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterJustin
Who's putting whom in place? I wouldn't think of doing that to 50-foot Hillary. Thanks for the kind words.

Fig.
April 24, 2008 | Registered CommenterFigaro
Your snappy answer prompts a question: Is it even possible to partially obliterate something? Random House and I seem to agree that pseudo-Hillary's use of the phrase "totally obliterate" is redundant.
May 18, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMarkFL
Sure, dude. Totally. Figaro was using a device called a PARELCON, the "like" figure, which amplifies a statement with a meaningless word. Totally amplifies it.
May 20, 2008 | Registered CommenterFigaro

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.