About This Site

Figaro rips the innards out of things people say and reveals the rhetorical tricks and pratfalls. For terms and definitions, click here.
(What are figures of speech?)
Ask Figaro a question!

This form does not yet contain any fields.

    « Heil, Glennster | Main | Sign of the Times »

    Rhetorical Eye of the Storm

    We all remember it keenly: water pouring through broken levees; mothers holding their children above the waterline; people stranded on rooftops begging for help; bodies lying in the streets of a great American city.

    President Barack Obama in a speech about New Orleans

    pragmatographia (prag-ma-toe-GRAF-ia), the action sequence. A form of enargeia (en-AR-ja), the special effects of rhetoric. From the Greek, meaning “action writing.”

    President Bush’s inaction over Katrina spoke louder than words, proving the conservative claim that you can’t rely on government. Obama’s latest speech tries to show that government actually can work. But first he wants to recall the disaster and its shameful aftermath.  “There’s no need to dwell on what you experienced and what the world witnessed,” he says, and then he proceeds to dwell on the experience with a neat pragmatographia, the action sequence of oratory.

    You can find the pragmatographia in Shakespeare whenever breathless characters describe what took place offstage, while the magic of technology lets film directors do the same thing with  a short sequence of scenes called a montage. 

    A good pragmatographia builds to a climax, and so does Obama’s. It starts with women holding up their babies, jumps in time to desperate victims on rooftops, and concludes with scandalous corpses.

    Want to try the figure yourself? Consider using an individual or very specific scene for your climax—not corpses but a single awful body. An individual conveys more emotion than a mass of people. And, despite its name, emotion is what the pragmatographia is all about.

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    Reader Comments (4)

    You've written a number of posts that have enargeia in them, but haven't yet fully explored the concept. Is that something you'd consider? The idea is fascinating--and I love how you cover it in "Thank You for Arguing"--but I sense that I'm missing something.
    August 30, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterFantop
    I've been thinking about doing just that. Enargeia is to rhetoric what computer generated effects are to movies. Most rhetoricians rather lamely translate the word as "vividness." A more accurate connotation would be "before your very eyes."

    More to come!
    August 30, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterFigaro
    Is this similar to the periodic sentence?
    September 1, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMegan C.
    You certainly do have periodic sentence here, but we're talking about different rhetorical instruments. I like to think of the period as a length of thought equal to the length of a full breath. the pragmatographia fits neatly into the period as a rhetorical montage of scenes.
    September 2, 2010 | Registered CommenterFigaro

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.