About This Site

Figaro rips the innards out of things people say and reveals the rhetorical tricks and pratfalls. For terms and definitions, click here.
(What are figures of speech?)
Ask Figaro a question!

This form does not yet contain any fields.

    « And Our Favorite Line of the Night Goes To... | Main | Look, What's Wrong with Saying "Look"? »

    This Time Obama Shows Up

    This time we’re not going to tell you who won. It’s a tough call (though instant polls show a slight plurality for Obama). Instead, we’ll give you a few tools. Then you decide.

    1. If you didn’t watch it on television, then good. We hope you went to bed early, got a good night’s rest, and dreamed sweet dreams of a better America. Then we hope you got up ridiculously early and watched the debate on the New York Times’s interactive video. It has a scrolling transcript along with the televised debate, along with fact checks as you go. That way you can see who’s exaggerating or just cheerfully lying. (Romney easily scores the most falsity points in this debate, though Obama had a few stretchers as well.) 

    2. Rate each candidate for phronesis. That’s Aristotle’s “practical wisdom,” the projection of a character who knows his stuff and knows how to apply it reasonably. Both candidates spoke simply and well and used lots of statistics, including highly misleading ones. Unlike last time, Obama managed to avoid saying “Uh” a lot. It made him sound more capable.

    3. Score their eunoia. Meaning “disinterested good will.” How much do they seem to care about people? Figaro cringes when politicians try to sound touchy-feely. Last night Obama and Romney were so busy going after each other they seemed to forget the “tender” parts (“tender” is a favorite word of Romney’s). Obama brought up his daughters several times. Romney essentially offered a job to a college student. Neither came across as that terribly, well, tender.

    4. Measure their arete. Meaning “virtue,” the candidate’s ability to stand for the values the audience has in common. Virtue tends to bring out participation by the base in each party. That’s because Democratic values differ from Republican ones. Obama talked about his grandfather’s use of the GI Bill and noted pointedly that it “wasn’t a handout.” Romney replied that government doesn’t create jobs. Both are really talking values here—talking directly to their base. 

    So who won? You decide. Then let us know in the comments below.

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    Reader Comments (3)

    Obama won. Cleanly and easily. He looked presidential, effectively attacked Romney, and made a good case for the next four years.
    October 17, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterCervisa
    I disagree. Romney made a great performance as he did last time around. It seems to me that the incumbent needs to do better than the challenger in the debate. I'd put it at at least a tie. Love your phronesis-eunoia-arete scoring, Fig. I'd say Romney won on all three. He came across as practical and wise, showed he cared about "100%" of Americans, and represented the best values of America, including his belief in God.
    October 17, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterSarah Eastwood
    It seems like the people commenting here had their minds made up about the candidates before the debate. If you like Obama, you think he wins on Ethos. If you like Romney, then his Ethos wins. Personally I'm interested in immigration issues and I thought Obama did better there.
    October 17, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterKatesha

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.