About This Site

Figaro rips the innards out of things people say and reveals the rhetorical tricks and pratfalls. For terms and definitions, click here.
(What are figures of speech?)
Ask Figaro a question!

This form does not yet contain any fields.


    Friday
    Dec112009

    Big Planets Don't Cry

    I had moist eyes during Obama’s election day speech in Chicago. But let me tell you: he does not get it.

    James Hansen, director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies

    reluctant conclusion, the eunoia enhancer; also anacoluthon (ah-na-co-LOO-thon), the grammar switcher.

    Today’s quote employs one of Figaro’s favorite argument tools: the reluctant conclusion. You claim you used to be on the other side, but facts or circumstances forced you to change your mind.

    The cool thing is, Hansen switches grammar while he switches sides. “I had moist eyes,” he says in the past tense. Then he changes to the present tense, “But let me tell you…” The last four words, “he does not get it” strike monosyllabically like a hand pounding a podium.

    Figaro does hate that expression, though. How can we get it when “it” has no antecedent?

    What Obama doesn’t get, according to Hansen is the impending apocalypse: “global chaos,” with a planet “in imminent danger of crashing.” Obama’s “politics as usual” won’t save us, Hansen says. But in America, politics is usual. We’re a republic, not a dictatorship. Hansen is a great preacher, but the sermon has to get beyond the choir.

     Snappy Answer: Does not get what?

    Thursday
    Dec102009

    Gaga Logic

    You gonna get that,
    Then I need the money.

    Lady Gaga, lyrics from “Kaboom”

    enthymeme (EN-thih-meme), the argument packet. From the Greek, meaning “something in the mind.”

    Figaro loves a Lady, even a lady who personifies a foul-mouthed hooker. While we exercise a very broad definition of “lady” (and don’t even think there’s a pun in that), we’re especially enamored of ladies who use Aristotelian logic.

    Lady Gaga does in her hit song what the philosopher did in his Rhetoric: both reduce the logical syllogism to the more succinct enthymeme.  The device takes a commonplace—a belief, value, attitude, or (in this case) desire—and uses it as a first step in convincing the audience.

    Syllogism:

    You desire my, uh, that.
    Successful acquisition of that requires a quid pro quo.
    Therefore, you must fulfill my need for money.

    Gaga Enthymeme (English translation):

    You intend to acquire that.
    So you must pay money for that.

    Aristotle understood that the middle line of a syllogism is painfully obvious, and therefore worth eliminating.

    Similarly, Lady Gaga’s That needs no explicit antecedant. And Figaro is happy to avoid it.

    Snappy Answer: I’ll see your That and raise you a This.

    Tuesday
    Dec082009

    Word It Like Warren

    Really smart people use figures instinctively, even if they don’t know what figures are.

    Take Warren Buffett. Investors read his annual Berkshire Hathaway Chairman’s Letter like it was Moses’ tablets from on high, mostly to enjoy his wit and wisdom. Well, okay, mostly to glean the secrets of the world’s savviest investor. But how many investment letters get quoted for decades afterward? Mr. Buffetts’ do, because he’s a wizard at figures—the rhetorical as well as the business kind.

    For instance, in his 2004 letter he said that a timely investor is one who’s “fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful.” That’s a first-class chiasmus, though Figaro doubts that he’d use the term.  “It’s far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price,” Buffett said. Another nice chiasmus.Try it yourself when you want your writing to stick out. It’s not a question of whether we’re against Google. It’s whether Google is against us.

    Besides using snazzy ways to change the usual word order, Buffett also likes one of Figaro’s own favorite devices: taking clichés literally. Here’s a quote from a panel discussion he did in 2008: “I try to buy stock in businesses that are so wonderful that an idiot can run them. Because sooner or later, one will.” See what he did? He took the cliché, “an idiot can run it,” and imagined that it wasn’t a cliché at all. Why prefer something that an idiot can run, if an idiot will never run it?

    Here’s another Buffet cliché-bender, from a talk he gave to MBA students in 2003: “I like to shoot fish in a barrel. But I like to do it after the water has run out.” Oldest cliché in the book. But Buffett was trying to illustrate that, in investing, he liked a sure thing to be even surer. And what’s a surer thing than fish in a barrel of water? Fish in a barrel without water.

    When he wanted to illustrate how underlings tend to come up with projections that justify a CEO’s foolish acquisition, Buffett undermined the cliché, “the emperor has no clothes”: “Only in fairy tales are emperors told that they are naked.”

    And Buffett knows how to define terms to get the upper hand in an argument. “Price is what you pay,” he said. “Value is what you get.” It reminds me of the late, lamented cartoon strip “Shoe,” when the son asks his journalist dad, “Why are you staring out the window? You should be typing.” Dad answers, “Typists type. Writers stare out windows.”

    If you really want to achieve immortality, though, talk like Yogi Berra, the man who famously said “If you find a fork in the road, take it,” and “Nobody goes there anymore. It’s too crowded.” When you abandon logic to achieve a higher wisdom: that’s a figure called a yogiism. Warren Buffett is good at this, too. “Occasionally,” he said, “a man must rise above principles.” You have to love a man like that—and people do.

    Easy for Figaro and Warren to say, right? Well, writing figuratively does take practice. One way to do it is to take an expression you admire and see how it varies from plain ordinary speech. Take a quote you like, and then write it as you’d usually say it. I call this technique “unwriting.” Take, for instance, another Buffett quote:

    “Beware of geeks bearing formulas.”

    Next, unwrite it:

    “You should be skeptical of number crunchers and their computer models.”

    Now ask yourself how Buffett’s quote varies from the unwritten version. As he likes to do, he twisted a cliché—“Beware of Greeks bearing gifts.” The old saying probably occurred to him when he was thinking of computer geeks. Hmmm. Beware of geeks… Beware of Greeks! Bearing…um, formulas! As I say, it takes practice.

    Meanwhile, you’ve already learned one of the secrets to being Warren Buffett: speak figuratively. All you have to do to complete the picture is to become an investment wizard and make more money than anybody in the world. Personally, Figaro hasn’t even figured out mutual funds yet. But you have to start somewhere.

    Thursday
    Dec032009

    Cynics: Do Not Read

    Here’s a little news flash for your Department of Media: Superman’s parents chose life and he was adopted in small-town USA by real Americans who run our factories, harvest our meat-bearing animals, and wave Old Glory down at the courthouse and the churches, not in Washington, D.C. by cynical power-brokers and liberal scientists.

    Steve Aydt, second-place entry in Slate.com’s “Write Like Sarah Palin” contest

     synecdoche, the generalizing trope.  From the Greek, meaning “swap.”

     Yeah, Figaro said he wouldn’t write about Palin anymore, but how could we resist this? Slate’s contest beautifully illustrates the political art of the synecdoche, the trope that makes an individual stand for a whole group, or a species for a genus, or vice versa. Agribusiness becomes the hard-working farmer watching over his amber waves of grain. The military shrinks down to one brave soldier. Wealthy heirs in Ivy League clubs miraculously morph into small businessmen struggling in the face of the capital gains tax.

    Steve Aydt nailed it. What the Liberal Media don’t understand is how REAL these fake people are. The synecdoche gains great power in an unrhetorical society, because people fail to see it or what it is: a trope. So Sarah Palin is no cynical rhetorician. She’s telling it like it is. And what’s “It”? Whatever stereotype that warms your red-blooded American heart and doesn’t trouble your hard-working, beer-drinking mind.

    Snappy Answer: Put that in your snowmobile and smoke it.

    Wednesday
    Dec022009

    Hiding It Under the Afghan

    The wrenching debate over the Iraq war is well-known and need not be repeated here. It’s enough to say that for the next six years, the Iraq war drew the dominant share of our troops, our resources, our diplomacy, and our national attention — and that the decision to go into Iraq caused substantial rifts between America and much of the world.

    President Obama, speaking at West Point

     occultatio (uh-cul-TAH-tio), the not-to-mention figure. From the Latin, meaning “insinuation.”

     Okay, people, we’re not going to mention that this whole stuck-in-Afghanistan thing happened because my predecessor—whom I won’t stoop to name—had an attention-span problem that caused our armed forces to end up in the wrong country.

    This not so subtle figure of thought is an occultatio, which highlights a point by denying making it. (“And we won’t even begin to go into that night you Saran Wrapped the toilet seat.”)

    After Obama’s non-mention of Bush-Iraq in yesterday’s speech, he non-mentioned it again a few minutes later. Figaro generally discourages the device. It makes you look more coy than commander-in-chiefly.

     Snappy Answer: Go ahead. Make my day.

    Tuesday
    Nov242009

    GOP Boots the Gipper!

    We support…by opposing… 

     

    Phrases repeated six times in proposed GOP litmus test

     Dialysis (di-AL-ih-sis), the piston figure. From the Greek, meaning “separation.”

    A resolution proposed for the Republican National Committee’s January meeting offers a set of ten propositions. A candidate who fails to support at least eight of the ten—through votes, statements, or questionnaires—would receive no support from the GOP.

    The text repeats a pair of identical phrases announcing that the party supports its stands by opposing the Democrats’. It’s a classic dialysis, an either-or figure that weighs propositions side by side.

    The inspiration came from Ronald Reagan, who said that someone who agrees with him 80% of the time is his friend, not his 20% enemy. Therefore, concluded the resolution’s supporters, someone who agrees only 70% of the time is a 100% enemy.

    While Figaro is in awe of that logic, the Gipper himself might have trouble meeting his party’s 80% dogma quota.

    Resolution: “We support smaller government, smaller national debt, lower deficits and lower taxes…”
    Reagan: Increased government spending by 60%.  Tripled federal debt. Signed largest tax increase in history in 1982. 

    Resolution: “We support market-based health care reform and oppose Obama-style government run health care.”
    Reagan: Vehemently opposed Medicare early in his political career, but as president supported its expansion

    Resolution: “We support legal immigration and assimilation into American society by opposing amnesty for illegal immigrants…”
    Reagan: Signed 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act, offering amnesty to illegal immigrants who had lived in the U.S. for at least four years. 

    Resolution: “We support containment of Iran…”
    Reagan: Secretly sold arms to Iran during the 1980s.

     Snappy Answer: The 40% enemy of my 60% enemy is my 60% friend.