About This Site

Figaro rips the innards out of things people say and reveals the rhetorical tricks and pratfalls. For terms and definitions, click here.
(What are figures of speech?)
Ask Figaro a question!

  • Contact Me

    This form will allow you to send a secure email to the owner of this page. Your email address is not logged by this system, but will be attached to the message that is forwarded from this page.
  • Your Name *
  • Your Email *
  • Subject *
  • Message *

« A Gadfly Flew Into His Mouth. | Main | Vote for Dirty Books! »
Tuesday
Nov072006

Tweedle Dee Versus Tweedle Stupid.

donkey_elephant.jpgQuote:  “In this election, the Republicans deserve to lose, and the Democrats don’t deserve to win.”  Robert J. Samuelson in the Washington Post.

Figure of Speech:  scesis onomaton (SKEE-sis o-NOM-a-ton), the idea repeat.  From the Greek, meaning “related words.”

Voters are sick of the Republicans, and not just because the party led us into an unnecessary war and jacked up the biggest deficit in history.  Americans hate corruption more than anything; you usually get a sea change in Congress when it’s clear that the party in power is corrupt.  And, boy, is this party corrupt.

So what will Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi do if she becomes Speaker of the House?  As one of her first moves, she’ll appoint Alcee Hastings chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.  A former federal judge, Hastings was convicted by the Senate of bribery.  Way to clean things up, Nancy!

Robert Samuelson responds with a particularly neat scesis onomaton (or S.O., as we like to call it), in which an idea gets repeated in successive phrases.  Unlike the tautology, which claims to prove something, the S.O. simply offers a parallel set of opinions.  It lets you spring a clever little surprise.  Readers think they’re being set up for a contrast:  the Republicans deserve to lose…  But they get a comparison instead: …and the Democrats don’t deserve to win.

Figaro is beginning to wonder whether our republic’s founders were right about the two-party system.  They thought it was a very bad idea.

Snappy Answer:  “And non-voters don’t deserve anything.”

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.