About This Site

Figaro rips the innards out of things people say and reveals the rhetorical tricks and pratfalls. For terms and definitions, click here.
(What are figures of speech?)
Ask Figaro a question!

This form does not yet contain any fields.

    « May Cause Priapism Among Stand-Alone Systems | Main | Take My Planet…Please. »

    The Republic Party for Which He Stands


    Quote:  “I congratulate the Democrat majority.”  President Bush, in his recent State of the Union Address.

    Figure of Speech:  apocope (a-PAH-co-pee), the end-biter.  From the Greek, meaning “snip off the end.”

    Washington is still in a dither over the president’s substitution of “Democrat” for “Democratic.”  But Figarists will be pleased to know that Bush was employing a figure of speech, the apocope, which snips off the last part of a word.  Poets once used the figure to sound poetical — by replacing “often” with “oft,” for instance.  You can still hear the figure when people ask “what’s the diff?” or battle terrorism with “intel.”

    Bush told NPR that his un-Democratic apocope was “an oversight, ” adding a Reaganesque cognitive malfunction:  “I didn’t even know I did it.”  (It reminds us of Charles Barkley’s complaint that his autobiography misquoted him.) But Bush did it on purpose! lament liberals. Nefarious code language! lecture linguists. 

    Figaro thinks the president is just trying to even the rhetorical odds.  The Democratic Party has a rhetorical advantage over the Republican Party.  After all, who talks about bringing “Republican government” to the Mideast? The problem is, no one but the Republican right wing uses “Democrat Party,” which makes the device too visibly rhetorical; and Figaro has told Washington time and time again that the best rhetoric disguises itself.  So we object to the phrase not because it’s manipulative, but because it’s clumsy.

    Snappy Answer:  “And we Democrats are thrilled to work with the radical right.”

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    Reader Comments (1)

    He put it back in. But not because he learned anything, but because he has to play nice.

    Includes a new Bushism, accurately predicted by Figaro several hours ahead of time.

    February 3, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterSydney J. Carton

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.