About This Site

Figaro rips the innards out of things people say and reveals the rhetorical tricks and pratfalls. For terms and definitions, click here.
(What are figures of speech?)
Ask Figaro a question!

This form does not yet contain any fields.


    Wednesday
    Aug152007

    Thar He Blows!

    moby_rove.jpgQuote:  “I realize that some of the Democrats are Captain Ahab and I’m the great white whale.”  Karl Rove

    Figure of Speech:  antonomasia (an-to-no-MAY-sia), the namer.  From the Greek, meaning “name swap.”

    President Bush calls his former consigliore and spinmeister “the architect,” but Karl “Moby” Rove suggests a more colorful moniker.   Now that Rove has retired to spend more time with the proverbial family, Democrats in Congress can’t wait to subpoena the man.  What metaphorical animal comes to mind in such a situation?  Trapped tiger? Treed bear?

    Rove makes himself into a comical Leviathan, while the Democratic Party becomes a peg-legged obsessive.  The result is a disarming antonomasia — a figure that puts people in the place of well-known names.   (For other examples click here and here.)

    Melville’s Moby Dick rose from the evil depths, controlled the psyche of a chief commander, and smashed everything to hell.  If the Great White Rove continues in this vein, we’ll definitely read his memoir.

    Snappy Answer:  “Spin me Ishmael.”

    Monday
    Aug062007

    Improve Your Waste Line

    A question from Ask Figaro:  

    Working hard or hardly working.  Or,  One trains minds, the other minds trains.  What figure of speech are these examples of?

    Dear R,

    It’s one of Figaro’s faves, the antistasis. It repeats a word while changing its meaning.  The antistasis (an-TIS-ta-sis) works especially well if you give it a chiasmus spin, making one clause mirror another.  The Bard himself liked the device:  “I wasted time and now time doth waste me.”

    Or, as one of Figaro’s student friends would say, “I wasted time and then got wasted.”

    Fig.

    Saturday
    Aug042007

    Talk About Worshiping the Press...

    bible_branding.gifQuote: “Do they object to getting a bag of Quaker oatmeal or Tide detergent or an AOL disc?”  Paul Tolleson, official with the International Bible Society - Send the Light, in Time.

    Figure of Speech: argumentum ad fortiori (for-tee-OR-ee), the argument from strength.

    A Bible publisher wants to distribute New Testaments, specially printed to fit inside those annoying plastic bags that accompany newspapers.  The idea has generated some criticism — much of it, to the group’s surprise, from Christians.  Tolleson’s reply pleases Figaro mightily, for two reasons:  it uses one of his favorite argument tactics, and it’s delightfully knuckleheaded.

    The fortiori argument employs a comparison.  If the weaker case succeeded, it stands to reason that the stronger case will.  People don’t mind getting soap with their newspaper, so why should they object to the Bible?

    Because, Christians answer, the Bible is not a brand (Word-o-God — Accept no substitutes!).  Believers do not want their most sacred text tossed in the trash with supermarket fliers.

    There’s a moral here, O faithful Figarists.  Before you argue from strength, make sure you actually have an argument from strength.

    Snappy Answer:  “Does it come with sin redemption coupons?”

    Saturday
    Jul212007

    How to Write a Winning College Essay

    Figaro tells how to make admissions officers fall in love with you.

    As someone who writes a lot about persuasion, I frequently get asked by high school juniors and their parents  how to write a successful college essay. My own son, George, sought my advice, and he was glad he did. His essay about a headache (yes, a headache), helped get him into his highly selective first-choice school, Middlebury College. His work was among 10 (out of a class of 850) read in front of the campus at Convocation. “The one they read before mine was by a Palestinian who wrote about shielding his little brother as an Israeli bomb hit their house,” George told me later. “‘Oh, great,’ I thought. ‘Now they’re going to read about my headache.’”

    It did the job, though. George wrote the essay himself, but he followed my advice. Here’s what I told him, and what I tell everyone who asks me.

    1. What’s your hook?

    While the top schools look for good writing, they’re more interested in character. Your Board scores will tell them how smart you are, and your grades let them know you study hard. Admissions officers also look for a student who will add something to the campus. Ask them about the most recent crop of first-year students, and you’ll see what I mean: “Our class includes a published novelist, an Olympic luger, and an artist who made a monumental sculpture out of Gummi Bears.” That’s what I mean by “hook.”

    Don’t stress out if you don’t really have one. (Remember George’s headache?) But it helps. My friend Alex, who’s about to enter her senior year in high school, has a second-degree black belt in judo. She was thinking about doing an essay on her beloved “Calvin & Hobbes.” Can you guess what my advice was? If you have a hook, write about the hook.

    2. Don’t express yourself.

    A college essay is an act of persuasion. Your job is to talk the admissions office into accepting you. So the essay isn’t your opportunity to get feelings off your chest, or amuse yourself, or imitate your favorite writer. Your teachers have spent far too much time telling you to express yourself. To persuade someone, you should express your reader’s thoughts and desires, and show how you embody them. Think: If you were an admissions officer, what would you be looking for in, say, you? Oh, and another thing:

    3. Relieve their boredom.

    Admissions officers read thousands of essays every year. Yours doesn’t have to be the most creative; it just has to be a good read. And how do you write such a marvel? By telling a story.

    4. A winning essay isn’t an essay.

    I probably sound like a Zen master here (The essay must write itself, Grasshopper), but my point is pretty simple: the college essay is mislabeled. It’s really a story. It should have a main character (you, presumably), a setting, some sort of conflict, and suspense.

    George wrote about how he developed Chronic Headache Syndrome at the beginning of seventh grade, when the family moved from New Mexico to an urban high school in Connecticut. The syndrome is triggered by a virus, and in a type-A person it creates a sort of negative feedback loop: the headache causes stress, which makes the headache worse.  George’s mother and I took him from one doctor to another. All of them prescribed drugs that would have turned him into a zombie. Finally, we found a psychiatrist who was an expert in biofeedback techniques. The doctor hooked George up to a machine that measured his brain waves. It had a monitor that showed an array of red bars.

    “If you relax your brain,” the doc said, “you create Alpha waves that will help make your headache go away. If you can turn all the bars green, I’ll give you a prize.”  Being the goal-oriented type, George sits down at the machine and PUSHES his brain. “UUUUGGGGH!” He’ll make those bars turn green.  ((Note how I switched to the present tense. It makes the story seem more immediate.  If you think you can handle this tricky tense, consider using it for your essay.)

    As George stares at the red bars, he thinks about himself—about the 50-something merit badges he earned on his way to becoming an Eagle Scout, about his love of competitive Nordic skiing, how he climbed the 48 tallest peak in New Hampshire before he turned 10, about how his whole identity has to do with meeting goals. But he comes to realize that the single-minded pursuit of things doesn’t always get you what you want.

    Still the bars won’t turn green. He realizes he has to do more than just relax: he must allow himself to trust that some things work themselves out on their own. “Is this what faith is?” he asks. And then comes the last line in his essay: “All the bars turn green.”

    That essay had all the elements of a story: a character, a conflict (type-A kid struggling against his type-A’ness in type-A fashion), suspense (will he make his headache go away?), and an epiphany (the nature of faith). He told the story with grace and humor, revealing just the kind of intelligent, maturing soul admissions officers love. (Hey, cut me some slack. I’m his dad.)

    5. It’s all about epiphany.

    Admissions people look for students who learn and grow, so your essay should show you learning and growing. Whether you write about your hook or your headache, don’t just brag or describe. Your essay should have a moment of revelation: what did you learn from your experience? How did it make you the thoughtful, sensitive, brave, strong person you are (or would like an admissions person to think you are) today? Show a process of learning, and a moment of revelation.

    6. Make yourself good and miserable.

    George did more than 30 drafts, spending a summer writing whenever he wasn’t working at his job or hiking outdoors. It was one of the hardest things he’d ever done, and it made him miserable. In other words, he felt just like a writer! With any luck, he’ll avoid following in his dad’s footsteps (I’m a writer) and go on to earn an honest living. Maybe he’ll advise students on their college essays, grow rich, and support me in my dotage. And to think a college essay started it all.

    Figaro is the author of the popular rhetoric blog, Figarospeech, and author of the bestselling Thank You for Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln and Homer Simpson Can Teach Us About the Art of Persuasion. He worked at Dartmouth College for ten years as an administrator—not in the admissions office, but he saw the process up close.

     

    Saturday
    Jul212007

    Operation Hairy Eyeball

    evil_eye.jpgQuote:   “No matter where you run, no matter where you hide, coalition Special Operations forces will find you and bring you to justice.”  Leaflet dropped over Iraq.

    Figure of Speech:  anaphora (an-AH-phor-a), the first-words repeater.  From the Greek, meaning “carry back.”

    The anaphora is a good zero-tolerance figure.   By repeating the first words in successive clauses, it says, “No exceptions.”  If you don’t like green eggs and ham, for example express your opinion categorically with an anaphora:   “I do not like them in a house.  I do not like them with a mouse.”

    You can understand Figaro’s love for the air-dropped psyops leaflet (psychological operations, formerly known as “propaganda”).  Resistance is futile, it says anaphorically.  But while the figuring is great, the leaflet may have done more harm than good, according to a recent Rand Corporation study.  The leaflet reached law-abiding citizens as well as insurgents — a serious kairos malfunction.  (See chapter 21 of Figaro’s book.)  And the creepy graphic?  In Iraqi culture, it gives everyone the evil eye.

    Snappy Answer:   “Exactly where is Justice?”

    Wednesday
    Jul182007

    Fatso


    sicko-poster-2.jpgFrom Ask Figaro:

     Dear Figaro,
    Thank you for an excellent website and book! I have a rhetorical news item for you.   I’ve read at least three articles about Michael Moore’s “Sicko” that all say more or less the same thing:  “Moore wants universal health care.  But Moore is a fat, unhealthy slob — folks like him would suck the system dry.  Therefore, Moore is wrong.”   Isn’t this a classic ad hominem attack?  That is, the rhetorical uberfallacy (note bound morpheme) that I learned about in 7th grade?
    Ty

    Dear Ty,

    First of all, is “Clever” your middle name? (And is your last name “Byhalf”? )  To answer your question:  Yes, Michael Moore is a fat slob.

    Oh, wait.  That wasn’t your question.  Calling Mr. Fahrenheit 911 fat is like calling Paris Hilton an airhead; it’s true enough almost to dwell beyond the realm of ad hominem.  Besides, the character attack lies  within rhetorical bounds.  Much harm, but no foul.  (See page 157 of Figaro’s book.) 

    The Moore attack does qualify as a far more interesting foul called the Red Herring, aka the “Look! a bird!” fallacy.  Its purpose is simply to distract, because it has little relevance to the issue. If Moore got fit, would his accusers then support universal health care? Give that man a Stairmaster, stat!  Moore’s opponents may think they’re accusing him of hypocrisy.  But he’s a health-care hypocrite only if “Sicko” advocates health.  It doesn’t.  It advocates health care.

    Al Gore, on the other hand, is a hypocrite, because he fails to live like a Hobbit.

    Fig.

    Got a comment? Click here.